A
member of the legal team for the National Democratic Congress (NDC), Abraham
Amaliba says the live telecast of the Presidential election case at the Supreme
Court is the “beginning of the demise of the case of the petitioners”, hence
maintaining the party’s position that the elections were devoid of
irregularities.
Describing
the NPP’s petition as “frivolous”, Lawyer Amaliba maintained that the
petitioners have no case and so, the hearing will mark the collapse of the
petition by the three leaders of the opposition New Patriotic Party,
challenging the legitimacy of President Mahama.
He
stressed that the 2012 general elections were free and fair.
Speaking
in an interview with Radio Gold, he expressed support for the live broadcast of
the election case.
“We
agree and we support and we are in line with the decision taken by the Chief
Justice to have a live telecast of this matter, and we shall go along with it.”
President
John Mahama and the NDC filed a joint affidavit to commence hearing of the
substantive matter of the petitioners’ case.
The
affidavits, according to lawyer Amaliba, are a rebuttal to all the charges and
allegations levelled against the President, which pointed out that the 2012
December 7 polls were rigged to favour the ruling party and President Mahama.
He
explained that in the joint affidavit, “we have decided that Johnson Asiedu
Nketia who has sworn to the affidavit, will give evidence on behalf of the NDC
and the President. And so, the President has provided what is called a power of
attorney through Asiedu Nketia to represent him in court and give evidence. So,
that is the joint affidavit. That is the implication of that joint affidavit.
The affidavits themselves are a rebuttal of or a reaction to the petitioners
claim that there were irregularities; there were malpractices, omissions in the
2012, 7th and 8th elections. And so, basically, we are refuting all charges, we
are refuting all allegations and saying that the elections held on the 7th and
8th December, 2012, and the will of the people must not be tampered with by the
Supreme Court.”
He
was certain there is no merit in the petitioners’ case, stressing that “we have
always maintained that this case is frivolous. We have always maintained that
the petitioners have no case. We have always maintained that these elections
were free and fair.”
Source:
Ameyaw Adu Gyamfi/Peacefmonline.com/Ghana
No comments:
Post a Comment