Contempt
of court was for some weeks a topical issue within the legal boundary
of the land with some people being hauled before the Supreme Court to
answer queries after having fallen foul.
Deputy Communications
Director of the New Patriotic Party, Sammy Awuku, was the first to be
dragged before the judges sitting on the election petition case, and
probably realized his ‘real size’ after a barrage of questions from the
“Sanhedrin”; the nine-member panel. He however escaped punishment.
Quite
soon afterwards, the Editor of the Daily Searchlight, Ken Kuranchie and
an NDC Communicator, Stephen Atubiga, were not fortunate enough as the
court sentenced them to 10 days and 3 days imprisonment respectively for
making contemptuous comments about the election petition.
And it
is likely that after the “battle of evidence” and cross-examination
which ended on Wednesday, some might delude themselves into thinking the
warnings issued by the court for people not to scandalize its
integrity, have lost its effectiveness.
Consequently, a former
Chief of Staff, Mr. Alex Segbefia has reminded political figures and the
entire nation of the court order; cautioning the citizenry to be
mindful of their utterances.
Speaking on Radio Gold on Thursday,
he pointed out that anyone who passes commentary that may scandalize the
integrity of the nine-member panel sitting on the election dispute can
still be charged with contempt.
He advised them not to “forget
that technically even though we don’t go to court, contempt of court
still applies. So, people should be a little bit circumspect in their
language from now till we can get back to court on 31st.”
The
former Deputy Chief of Staff also issued a warning to political parties
to refrain from any attempt to put a twist on the election petition.
He
warned the parties not to hype the outcome of the case but rather psych
their supporters to accept the court verdict irrespective of the
direction it takes.
He explained that the petition has created
anxiety on both sides of the political divide and it would be advisable
for all parties to note that “at the end of the day, no political party
is going to make the decision and no one is in the bosom of the court or
for that matter of the Supreme Court to say how they see the evidence”
or determine the nature of the irregularities that emerged from
petition.
“Hyping people’s expectations is not the way forward.
Explain yourself succinctly. Don’t make a judgement for the Supreme
Court,” he further stated.
In his view, the court process was ‘fair’ to all parties involved in the election dispute.
Mr
Segbefia further stressed that the party is “confident that no
surprises will expend on us in terms of the evidence that came out. So,
as far as the respondents or the NDC as political party who was
represented there is concerned, we didn’t come across any serious
surprises that will make anybody cringe.” |
|
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment