Kweku
Baako Jnr., Editor-In-Chief of the New Crusading Guide newspaper,
believes the former Chief Executive Officer of the Ghana National
Petroleum Corporation (GNPC), Mr. Tsatsu Tsikata, was somewhat left
off-the-hook when he appeared before the Sole Commissioner to assist in
investigations into the sale of a drill ship Discoverer 511.
The
ship which was sold for 24 million dollars has since been tainted with
controversy, hence calling for the Judgment debt Commission.
Mr.
Tsikata, appearing before the Commission, indicated that during his
tenure; "there was no judgment or judgment debt against GNPC or
Government of Ghana as far as December 2000, and GNPC was still a
corporate body that can sue and be sued.”
According to him, at
the time he left office, the case was still pending in a London High
Court, which was defended by Bindman and Partners when the erstwhile
Kufour government assumed office in 2001.
This he said contrary to earlier claims that the case had already been thrown out of court.
He
further told the Commission that "though the GNPC owed SG over $40
million, it was due to various credit transactions between them since
1997, which, from all indications, SG was prepared to compromise and
accept $20 million," as published in the Wednesday edition of the
Chronicle newspaper.
"At a point in time, the GNPC and its legal
team, which was Bindman and Partners, managed to beat down the debt to
$12 million, however, in the course of the process of the negotiation,
he (Tsikata) left office," he added.
But contributing to Peace
FM's political analysis programme, Kweku Baako posited that the
Commission seemed to have made some omissions when he (Tsastu Tsikata)
appeared before it.
According to him, the Commission failed to
ask him certain pertinent questions and so, held that the silence of the
Commission was an indictment on the proceedings.
“Was there a
question posed to Mr. Tsikata that GNPC was indebted or not, 40 million
dollars? Look, that loud absence or silence on that particular question
is a telling telling indictment”
He explained that the claim by
Mr. Tsikata that "they filed a claim of 40 million should have triggered
further interrogation by the Council for the Commission…It’s a singular
omission. Look, I just cannot understand and believe it.
“He
posed his own question and proceeded to answer it…Nobody has said that
during his time, there was a judgment debt; judgment debt means it’s
been given an order of a court. What has been said was that GNPC has
been saddled with the debt of 40 million dollars plus and that the
judgment was delivered since June, 2001. At that time, you were not
there. So, that point he made was an unnecessary gloss.” |
|
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment